Showing posts with label feminism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label feminism. Show all posts

Friday, May 6, 2011

Manifesto of a Country Boy


I’m a farm boy- I had my first work when I was less than ten, I grew and sold my first crop around that same time, I’ve never had a job that wasn’t in agriculture or forestry, and I’ll be damned if I’m anything but a farm boy. So much so, that while the dreams of so many rural kids is to get to the cities, I’m majoring in environmental studies and biology the university not two or three mile as the crow flies from my house, aiming for graduate school in agronomy at the U of M.

Yessir, I’m a country man, and like every man in America, I’m beset by the expectations of my gender role- in the case of masculinity, it’s almost more of a race/class/gender role. What is a rural, white, man? I don’t know if the image of rural masculinity comes from an honest cultural tradition, or if it’s just something pushed by media, or both, but can tell you this: the image, the role, of the rural white man is a hyper-masculine, misogynistic, homophobic, anti-intellectual, anti-urban, pseudo-populist construct. A rural man, if popular image is to be believed, is responsible (a word that here means ‘willing to blame the poor for their lot while ignoring corporate subsidies’), hard working (‘won’t unionize’), ‘independent’ ( ‘willing to blame Mexicans for his lot while ignoring corporate outsourcing’), and humble (‘not an uppity intellectual’). He loves America (and doesn’t question the necessity of war), loves Jesus (and doesn’t question the agenda of his church), and doesn’t trust those big-city ‘latte liberals’, college students, and ‘radical environmentalists and feminists’ pushing their socialist agenda through big government and the Fed and liberal media and big business. No, a rural man is no soy-swilling, long-haired, effete snob. He’s a man’s man. And, let us not forget, a rural man is a carnivore; he takes his cornbread and coffee with short ribs, and he chows sweet beastflesh- never shall tofu touch his lips.

Recently, I became a vegetarian. Not for animal rights purposes, mind you, though I’m not big on agribusiness practices. No, I did it for social and environmental reasons. I just don’t see the sense in using so much land to grow so much grain for so many cows, when there are so many hungry people in the world. Now, that right there ought to fulfill multiple expectations of the rural man- I’m trying to act pragmatically, responsibly, with personal integrity, and thriftily; I’m doing this against waste and against agro-industrial practices that screw up our common home and the lives we live in it. Yet, the fact that I just ate a lentil stew with a side of curried tofu ensures that my penis is now a nonfunctional organ hanging in front of my rapidly developing ovaries, and my flannel shirts have all just become ‘ironic’.

Now, this article isn’t about being a vegetarian. No, that’s just what got me thinking enough to write it. This article’s about what I already covered- a ridiculous standard of rural masculinity. How can one be a man? If I fail to follow the prescribed notions of manhood, I will have failed to assert myself, and I am not a man. If I assert myself and stand against this nonsense and for ecological and social responsibility and an active critique of the institutions of our society, I’ll have failed to follow the prescribed notions of manhood, and I am not a man. With such a standard, the only way to be a man is to be an irresponsible, callous, prejudiced, willfully ignorant person working for a goal contrary to your own self-interest. The Catch-22, of course, being that a person like that is not a tolerable man.

There’s only one solution I can think of, and it’s a continuation of what I’ve been doing since the day my sister showed me ‘Killing Us Softly’ and I stopped thinking that feminists were the man-hating hypocrites that I’d always seen and heard them portrayed as. The only solution is to break free of this whole damn stereotype of rural masculinity. Why should I follow a code of conduct based in asinine, sexist assumptions, a code of conduct that contradicts itself by demanding responsibility while demonizing responsible actions, that is anti-intellectual, that serves only to set rural folk against city folk and the petit bourgeois while demonizing those that fight the system of power, that discourages compassion, that fetishizes violence, that is pushed on us relentlessly by urban professionals working for massive corporations (the big six media companies and their entertainment subsidiaries)? Why the hell should I be a lapdog for a culture war waged by some bourgeois thinktank in New York against other bourgeois think tanks in New York? Why should I spend my days complaining about ‘latte liberals’ and the ‘Hollywood elite’ while corporate stooges and the Wall Street elite tell me how to live my life? Why should I teach my sons that an education and a vocabulary are things to be ashamed of?

Don’t misunderstand me here- I’m not attacking rural men. I AM a rural man. I’m not saying rural men are uneducated, racist, sexist, homophobic apologists for a system of exploitation and domination- I’m not saying that because it’s not true, unless you let it be. I’m saying we’re persistently portrayed as such and pressured to be such to the point where some of us have foolishly taken it as part of our identity. I’m not here to bash rural men, I’m here to tell you to stop letting conservative culture war pundits and the entertainment media shape your idea of what a rural man is. It’s time to take gender back, and then kick it’s ass. You want responsibility? Quit demonizing the poor and start thinking about who’s warming our planet. You want to fight the elite? Stop worrying about urban hipsters and start worrying about CEOs. You want the government to get out of your life? Let’s start with curtailing the runaway military-industrial complex, stopping theocratic blue laws, bringing accountability to the cops, and ending corporate welfare. You want honesty? Stop mindscrewing yourself into thinking capitalist-dominated financial institutions want to force socialism on you, and take a look at what those capitalist-dominated financial institutions ARE forcing on you.

The reactionaries think that because I’m a straight, rural white guy, they can count on me as some automatic recruit for the most troglodytic, regressive part of their agenda; a culture war that marginalizes and casts scorn on women, on femininity, working folk, people of color, immigrants, the at least 10% of our friends and neighbors who are gay, and others. They think they can make me into a sexist, homophobic, theocratic, nationalistic stooge who’ll turn a blind eye to their embezzling, warring, repression, civil rights abuses, union-busting, torture-funding, and river-poisoning just so I can feel like I’m holding on to the white, male privilege which, in the wake of the rape of rural communities by agribuiness, corporate-written government policy, and neocolonialist globalization, is all a lot of rural white guys have left.

No, sir; I ain’t gonna be that sort of ‘man’. I’m my own man, and this bowl of alu mattar? Consider it my resignation from your identity racket. My delicious resignation.

Get That Boehner Away from America's Women!

Get That Boehner Away from America’s Women!
Or
America Must Rally Against GOP Anti-Choice Putsch
Emmett Doyle

            In 1973, Roe v Wade officially established the right of American women to control over their bodies and reproductive rights. Since that day, it has been under constant, unrelenting attack. This year may prove crucial in deciding its fate. As we speak, initiatives are underway on both state and federal levels to restrict access and rights to abortion.
The House has already voted to defund Planned Parenthood by halting Title X funding, which has, since 1970, allowed organizations like Planned Parenthood to provide lifesaving medical treatment to millions of women. One in five American women (including a good many pro-lifers) receive health care from Planned Parenthood, of those that do, six out of ten say it is their primary source of care.
The most ridiculous part of the defunding campaign in the continuing resolution, which also targets, among other things, teen pregnancy community grants, the Affordable Health Care Act, and the EPA’s ability to regulate air pollution, is that federal funding for abortions hasn’t happened since the 70s. All of the funding the Fed is cutting is coming out of the rest of Planned Parenthood’s services- providing contraceptive, cheap medical care, cancer and STI testing, and the like. The only way they’ll prevent any abortions with this is if they drive Planned Parenthood under- and then they’ll have done so at the expense of women’s health services. Of course, driving them under may actually increase the number of abortions, when one considers the 2.5 million people who receive contraceptives each year from the organization. Some 973,000 unintended pregnancies and 406,000 abortions are prevented each year by Planned Parenthood.
The defunding goes beyond the disenfranchisement of American women. The continuing resolution will also defund international family planning, AIDS fighting measures, the UN Population Fund, and foreign aid health services, and reinstate the global gag rule (The Mexico City Policy), forcing NGOs that receive any federal funding to refrain from performing or promoting abortion services- even if, like Planned Parenthood, their abortion services are not supported by the federal government.
In addition to the defunding, there is the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, which would not only redefine rape as ‘forcible rape’ (apparently being drugged and brutalized doesn’t count anymore), and the Protect Life Act, which would allow any hospitals receiving federal funds to refuse to terminate a pregnancy- even when a woman’s life is in danger (yes, ladies, your lives matter less than the potential life of fetuses; and embryos; and zygotes).
The assault on choice is coming not only through the federal level, but through the states. South Dakota, Nebraska (where already woman have been forced to give birth to a child she knew would not survive due to the state’s ban on abortion after 20 weeks), and Iowa are all currently reviewing bills that would define ‘protection of the unborn’ as legitimate grounds for murder- effectively legalizing an open season on abortion providers. South Dakota has passed a bill that forces women to visit a ‘Crisis Pregnancy Center’ (centers run by religious organizations, infamous for their misleading claims) before getting an abortion, and Texas is about to pass another just like it. Pennsylvania, Kansas, Virginia, Florida, Indiana, Texas, Oklahoma, and Ohio are all considering ‘Heartbeat Bills’ that would make abortion illegal after a heartbeat is detected (between eighteen days and five weeks). One bill in Georgia goes beyond crazy- it demands that all miscarriages (which make up about a quarter of all pregnancies) be investigates to make sure that there was no human involvement. Rep. Franklin (GOP), the man who introduced the bill, also introduced a measure to redefine rape victims as ‘accusers’ until defendants were proven guilty (because apparently, a crime didn’t happen until the perpetrator of that crime has been identified and convicted- well, unless the crime in question is anything but rape). Here in Minnesota, four identical bills have been introduced by the MN GOP, all similarly banning state funding for abortion. This can be recognized as nothing but a concerted putsch against women’s rights.
The pro-choice resistance, however, is fighting back. Demonstrations have been held all around the countries, condemnations are flying, and petitions are being circulated. The DFL here in Minnesota have returned fire on the GOP with the Reproductive Privacy Act, which would stop government from interfering with reproductive freedom in any manner. Still, the pro-choicers need to rally! There is a nationwide battle, in the streets, the media, and the legislature, that may decide the future of reproductive freedom in this country. I urge you, readers, to be on the side of choice.